![]() Reliability in psychometrics refers to the consistency of results across different measurements. Moreover, it’s a valid instrument for measuring the burnout level of nurses working in hospitals.Įxperts view this instrument as highly reliable. Speaking of this last type of validity, a study conducted with nurses found that the Maslach Burnout Questionnaire has a high divergent (or discriminant) validity between emotional exhaustion, personal fulfillment, and depersonalization subscales. In effect, unwanted associations can alter expected results, which is why this divergence is necessary. ![]() This validity guarantees that the constructs of the test aren’t related to those with which they shouldn’t be. In this regard, correlations have been observed between various behavioral scales with the MBI.ģ. This type of validity measures the correlation of a test with the measure of another previously recognized one. This makes it possible to compare results from different populations and cultures in order to design better prevention and intervention strategies.Ģ. Next, we’ll review some of the strengths of the MBI that have been highlighted in the journal, Ciencia & trabajo.ġ. An investigation conducted with Italian university students indicated that it’s a valid and reliable test for measuring exhaustion in students. This is the MBI-General Survey for Students (MBI-GS ). It’s also worth mentioning that there’s a fourth MBI, designed for adult learners. The three subscales are identified as personal efficacy, exhaustion, and cynicism. Although it maintains the same structure as the two previous versions, it only contains 16 items. It also retains the same three subscales.įinally, there’s the MBI-General Survey (MBI-GS), a more generic version. This version has the same structure as the MBI-HSS. Here, the word patient is changed to student, since the context is different. The second version is the MBI-Educators (MBI-ES). It’s the classic version that consists of 22 items divided into 3 subscales. This is designed to be applied to human services professionals. ![]() The first is the MBI-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). Versions of the MBIĪccording to an article published in Ciencia & trabajo, there are three versions of the MBI. The higher the final score, the greater the probability of job burnout, except in the field of personal realization.There are also some values that are taken as a reference to indicate that, although there may not be burnout syndrome in the strict sense, there are strong indications that it could be taking shape.Įmotional exhaustion or work burnout can have an impact on personal life, reducing contact with others and favoring feelings of sadness, disappointment, and uselessness. They must complete the questionnaire in a period of between ten and 15 minutes.The maximum score they can obtain is 132. The MBI asks the individualto grade each of its 22 statements from 0 to 6, taking into account the frequency with which they experience that situation. Feelings of efficiency and labor evolution. Distancing from or lack of interest in work. Feelings of exhaustion due to work requirements. The tool evaluates three aspects of burnout syndrome: Its objective is to measure the intensity and frequency with which they experience certain symptoms related to job burnout. The inventory consists of 22 items in the form of statements associated with the attitudes and feelings that an individual experiences toward their work. The American psychologist, Christina Maslach, designed the instrument with her colleagues Susan E. For this reason, experts frequently use it. However, the Maslach-Burnout Inventory is one of the most complete. ![]() ![]() There are several tests for assessing job burnout. Burnout syndrome has both physical and emotional consequences. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |